@ Ferris State (1/28-1/29)

[BGhockeyfan94]

How do you not call that a facemask after looking at the replay?

[mbenecke]

Just awful, out of position play in OT, and Ferris wins it 2-1.

BG takes 4 points this weekend.

[TalonsUpPuckDown]

Pitters hits a guy in the back (who turned at the very last second) and they’re reviewing for a possible major.

Apparently Eigner kicked Pitters out of the box and sent him to the locker room before the review is even finished. Super weird.

Pitters received a 2 for boarding, 2 for roughing, and a 10 minute misconduct.

Pitters ran his mouth in the box. Bergeron once sent Mitch McLain to the showers mid-game for the same thing.

[jpfalcon09]

Ferris is always a unique place to play because the ice surface is so tight. Neutral zone play is extra important turnovers can lead to quick zone entry/transition. The rink could expose BGs defensemen, but Ferris is still below avg. BG really should get 2 wins if they play with any level of urgency.

This has split all over it. I expect two close games, one where BG makes enough mistakes they can't overcome for a loss.

Pretty much nailed this one. At least walked away with the extra point tonight.

[pdt1081]

Pitters hits a guy in the back (who turned at the very last second) and they’re reviewing for a possible major.

Apparently Eigner kicked Pitters out of the box and sent him to the locker room before the review is even finished. Super weird.

Pitters received a 2 for boarding, 2 for roughing, and a 10 minute misconduct.

Pitters ran his mouth in the box. Bergeron once sent Mitch McLain to the showers mid-game for the same thing.

Team rule. Get a 10 for running your mouth, and you're not finishing the game.

[pdt1081]

How do you not call that a facemask after looking at the replay?

You work for the CCHA and you're afraid of Bob Daniels? Absolutely the only explanation. It was plain as day.

[TommyG]

4 points is ok for a road weekend, but there is nothing about this team that makes me think there is a playoff run in them. Just mediocre play. Lucky they got the win last night.

[pdt1081]

Ironically, referee Brian Hill also worked the OSU game in BG. Referee Mike Forys also worked the Bemidji series in BG....

[mbenecke]

Now I’m confused. We did get a point out of last night, right?

The CCHA standings page this morning shows Ferris having gained 3 points last night, with BG having not added any. We stayed at 29, and they climbed from 21 to 24, despite it being a win in 3x3 OT.

Can someone that looks at the standings with some regularity verify what I’m looking at?

[TalonsUpPuckDown]

Now I’m confused. We did get a point out of last night, right?

The CCHA standings page this morning shows Ferris having gained 3 points last night, with BG having not added any. We stayed at 29, and they climbed from 21 to 24, despite it being a win in 3x3 OT.

Can someone that looks at the standings with some regularity verify what I’m looking at?

You're correct that it's incorrect. CHN has the correct standings.

Edit: I emailed Dominic Hennig about this.

Double Edit: Fixed. Word is that it was correct last night but our communications team entered the wrong info and since all this stuff is interlinked the BG update overwrote the CCHA update.

[BG84]

The calculation of points is insane. BG has 30 points with a record of 10-7-1 2-1 0. Cool. 10 wins x 3 is 30. But there's a tie, which makes 31. But there are two OT wins which are subtracted for 29. Then an OT loss, which is added, for 30. I guess. I went round and round with the CCHA on Twitter and was told emphatically more than once that there are no ties.

[bgbill]

The calculation of points is insane. BG has 30 points with a record of 10-7-1 2-1 0. Cool. 10 wins x 3 is 30. But there's a tie, which makes 31. But there are two OT wins which are subtracted for 29. Then an OT loss, which is added, for 30. I guess. I went round and round with the CCHA on Twitter and was told emphatically more than once that there are no ties.

CCHA presentation of standings is a little confusing due to "Overtime wins and losses appear in both the W and L columns, as well as the OTW and OTL columns." as noted below the standings chart.

[BG84]

The calculation of points is insane. BG has 30 points with a record of 10-7-1 2-1 0. Cool. 10 wins x 3 is 30. But there's a tie, which makes 31. But there are two OT wins which are subtracted for 29. Then an OT loss, which is added, for 30. I guess. I went round and round with the CCHA on Twitter and was told emphatically more than once that there are no ties.

CCHA presentation of standings is a little confusing due to "Overtime wins and losses appear in both the W and L columns, as well as the OTW and OTL columns." as noted below the standings chart.

I understand, and it's insane. I'd do this:
Regulation W = 3
Regulation L = 0
Regulation T = 1
OT W = 1
SO W = 1

BG's record would be 8-7-4-2-0. Add up the points.

Make it so.

[Schadenfreude]

The calculation of points is insane. BG has 30 points with a record of 10-7-1 2-1 0. Cool. 10 wins x 3 is 30. But there's a tie, which makes 31. But there are two OT wins which are subtracted for 29. Then an OT loss, which is added, for 30. I guess. I went round and round with the CCHA on Twitter and was told emphatically more than once that there are no ties.

CCHA presentation of standings is a little confusing due to "Overtime wins and losses appear in both the W and L columns, as well as the OTW and OTL columns." as noted below the standings chart.

I understand, and it's insane. I'd do this:
Regulation W = 3
Regulation L = 0
Regulation T = 1
OT W = 1
SO W = 1

BG's record would be 8-7-4-2-0. Add up the points.

Make it so.

I'd be fine with letting games end in ties after 60 minutes again, but that's just me.