In my personal opinion, it could be better too. And it WILL be better. Maybe even encyclopedia britannica better. But for the start I have had right now, researching, coding, typing, debugging, whatever primarily by myself, I'm damn happy with it. Also in my personal opinion, you REALLY need to learn some tact and when to shut your trap.golfertk14 wrote:All I'm saying is that it could be better; granted it's still a pretty young site. Why i say this is because I've been to other college sports board/forums/fan pages, etc. and they've had encyclopedias full of pictures, info, sound bytes and other things about their team. I just think it could be better. Look at joshharris.com...it's still new, but it's got a lot of interesting facts, pictures and information pertaining to JH. That's how bgsusports.com should run. In my personal opinion it could be better.
And I agree that joshharris.com looks fantastic, but its also all about how things are made available. Not saying its an easy task by any means, but do you realize the research and number crunching and re-writing from bits and pieces I did with some of the pages on there? I'm guessing you don't. Not in the least bit. And for that, you can kiss off.



