Omar Jacobs on clevelandbrowns.com

mk455 · Post by **mk455** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:21 am

there is a poll on the front page of the browns site that asks 'which mac quarterback will be the first to lead his team to a super bowl victory?" the choices are charlie frye, byron leftwich, chad pennington, ben roethlisberger, and omar jacobs. go vote for omar!

bgsuman · Post by **bgsuman** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:22 am

http://www.clevelandbrowns.com

for the lazy types, like me..

mk455 · Post by **mk455** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:22 am

haha, sorry

bgsuman · Post by **bgsuman** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:29 am

no biggie, just hoping people might be more inclined to vote if it was easier to get there

mk455 · Post by **mk455** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:32 am

http://dawgtalk.clevelandbrowns.com/ubb ... ost1180741

Schadenfreude · Post by **Schadenfreude** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:46 am

I vote for Ben.

Deep down, you know I'm right.

hammb · Post by **hammb** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:58 am

Schadenfreude wrote:I vote for Ben.

Deep down, you know I'm right.

Schad, as pathetic as my Browns have been over the past 15 years or so I can at least take solace in one thing: The Steelers will always choke.

Cowher has NEVER been able to get his teams ready to play their way through the playoffs, and I'm thinking that isn't about to start.

I'd probably vote for Leftwich as quick as any of them. I think Byron is the best QB of the bunch (Omar could surpass him), and I think J-Ville could be an up & coming team in the next year or two.

BGSU-Ph.D. · Post by **BGSU-Ph.D.** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 11:32 am

Too bad Josh isn't an option.

Metz · Post by **Metz** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:19 pm

BGSU-Ph.D. wrote:Too bad Josh isn't an option.

Him and Omar are the same option. "Omar Jacobs or someone else." I'll just assume the someone else is Josh and that they think all BG quarterbacks are capable of winning super bowls and should be grouped together.

BGSU-Ph.D. · Post by **BGSU-Ph.D.** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 1:09 pm

Metz wrote:
BGSU-Ph.D. wrote:Too bad Josh isn't an option.
Him and Omar are the same option. "Omar Jacobs or someone else." I'll just assume the someone else is Josh and that they think all BG quarterbacks are capable of winning super bowls and should be grouped together.

It seems like a slap in the face to Josh to have Omar listed as an option when he isn't in the NFL.

Metz · Post by **Metz** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 1:57 pm

BGSU-Ph.D. wrote:It seems like a slap in the face to Josh to have Omar listed as an option when he isn't in the NFL.

Yeah, I was being very sarcastic there. Sorry it didn't show

kdog27 · Post by **kdog27** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:07 pm

"Schad, as pathetic as my Browns have been over the past 15 years or so I can at least take solace in one thing: The Steelers will always choke.

Cowher has NEVER been able to get his teams ready to play their way through the playoffs, and I'm thinking that isn't about to start.
quote"

Still a lot more than you can say for your Brownies

mk455 · Post by **mk455** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:07 pm

holy s**t omar jumped up to third place behind frye. its be with 31.4%, frye 30.9%, omar 20.5%, pennington 9.3% and leftwich 7.9% with almost 3300 votes in

duckunder53 · Post by **duckunder53** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 4:54 pm

I put my vote in for Omar!

Schadenfreude · Post by **Schadenfreude** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:08 pm

That is sort of a slap at Josh, isn't it.

At least they could have said "Frye/Harris" as a single option.