Cole Magner and Atlanta Update

Discussion of the Falcon football team.
User avatar
BelieveNBG
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 529
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 4:51 pm

Cole Magner and Atlanta Update

Post by BelieveNBG »

http://www.atlantafalcons.com/multimedi ... yPhoto.jsp?

Image

The caption states: Cole Magner had a whale of a day catching the football
User avatar
Falconfreak90
Rubber City Falcon
Rubber City Falcon
Posts: 18541
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:28 am
Location: Green, OH
Contact:

Post by Falconfreak90 »

Excellent!! Knock em dead, Cole.
Michael W.
BGSU-12 TIME MAC CHAMPION
FALCON FOOTBALL ROCKS!
User avatar
jacojdm
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:45 am
Location: cleveland
Contact:

Post by jacojdm »

what a great photo. good luck to cole.

why is it that seemingly every new receiver in the nfl the past few years is wearing no. 11 or 19 (including jerry rice)?
User avatar
TG1996
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 12708
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 3:27 am
Location: Indianapolis
Contact:

Post by TG1996 »

We've been getting training camp feeds from around the NFL at work this week, and I've been looking for an Assassin highlight or two. Nothing yet, but I'll keep my eyes peeled for #19!!!
"I don't believe I can name a coach, anywhere, anytime, anyhow, who did it better than Doyt Perry."
-1955 BG Assistant Bo Schembechler

BGSUsports.com - Where ESPN.com goes for BG history.
User avatar
hammb
The Stabber of Cherries
The Stabber of Cherries
Posts: 14434
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:21 am
Location: Bowling Green

Post by hammb »

jacojdm wrote:what a great photo. good luck to cole.

why is it that seemingly every new receiver in the nfl the past few years is wearing no. 11 or 19 (including jerry rice)?
It was my understanding that WRs have wanted to wear those numbers for years, but they were against NFL rules. I think they lifted that rule last year or so, and it makes it the "cool" thing to wear the low numbers.
User avatar
tekekini
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1900
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: O-H-I-O

Post by tekekini »

i think cole has a great shot at making the team.

from what i understand jenkins just moved to #1 on the depth chart and I hear a lot of talk about the falcons lacking a good possession receiever, which cole would be good at i think. kinda like proehl was for the rams
User avatar
Warthog
Freak Wanna-be!!
Freak Wanna-be!!
Posts: 7042
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:57 am
Location: Bowling Green, OH

Post by Warthog »

If you check the Falcons website, they go four deep on their depth chart at both WR positions. Cole is not listed. FWIW.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools."
- Ernest Hemingway
User avatar
1987alum
Noah's Dad
Noah's Dad
Posts: 7691
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 12:54 pm
Location: Philly

Post by 1987alum »

Warthog wrote:If you check the Falcons website, they go four deep on their depth chart at both WR positions. Cole is not listed. FWIW.
That doesn't surprise me. The deal goes down when the "real" training camp opens.
Hey, look at me! I'm all over the InterWebs!
Facebook ~ Twitter @ CoachKarlPA ~ LinkedIn
Germainfitch1
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1029
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 5:58 pm

Post by Germainfitch1 »

11 and 19. The reason that many rookie WRs are wearing low numbers is not because it is the cool thing to do. TE's and WR's are marked to wear numbers 80-89. When they come into camp veterans usually have those numbers already. TE's can wear 40-49 as well but don't have to. Some WR's (Keyshawn for instance) have recieved special permission from the league to wear the lower numbers, many were grandfathered in before the rule came down I beleive. But regardless the rule is WR's 80-89. If Cole makes the team. His number will likely change.
User avatar
kdog27
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 7174
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:35 pm
Location: Alabama

Post by kdog27 »

Braylon Edwards is wearing #17 this year. If anyone cares :lol:
User avatar
Redwingtom
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 5251
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:16 pm

Post by Redwingtom »

Warthog wrote:If you check the Falcons website, they go four deep on their depth chart at both WR positions. Cole is not listed. FWIW.
You just need a better website :)

http://www.ourlads.com/secure/depthchart.cfm?index1=ATL
Redwingtom
User avatar
BGSUVA
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1031
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 11:06 pm

Post by BGSUVA »

Falcon's don't have a reciever period. They are horrible. Cole should have a great shot at making the team
User avatar
hammb
The Stabber of Cherries
The Stabber of Cherries
Posts: 14434
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:21 am
Location: Bowling Green

Post by hammb »

Germainfitch1 wrote:11 and 19. The reason that many rookie WRs are wearing low numbers is not because it is the cool thing to do. TE's and WR's are marked to wear numbers 80-89. When they come into camp veterans usually have those numbers already. TE's can wear 40-49 as well but don't have to. Some WR's (Keyshawn for instance) have recieved special permission from the league to wear the lower numbers, many were grandfathered in before the rule came down I beleive. But regardless the rule is WR's 80-89. If Cole makes the team. His number will likely change.
That rule is gone. A number of WRs, Michael Jenkins and Roy Williams for instance, wore numbers under 20 last year. I don't know why, but they took away that rule and it seems to be the cool thing to wear low numbers as a WR now.

All I know is I was at Dick's tonight and finally found the Orange Braylon jersey :)
Germainfitch1
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1029
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 5:58 pm

Post by Germainfitch1 »

# 17 for the entire year?
Germainfitch1
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1029
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 5:58 pm

I was wrong

Post by Germainfitch1 »

Post Reply