Trev Alberts and my Wisconsin experience

BGorDeath · Post by **BGorDeath** » Sun Sep 04, 2005 9:57 pm

Yes, it was disappointing that we lost to Wisconsin, but the most aggravating time of the weekend for me was making the mistake listening to Trev Alberts. Why does he have a job? I just don't understand how this arrogant prick keeps a job. Every time he opens his mouth, I believe I see Satan's face in there. I get tired of pointing out what he says to make me think this, so I won't burden anyone because I am sure you have heard it too.

Trev Alberts is a douche bag.

Thanks for listening. That was cathartic.

Tricky_Falcon · Post by **Tricky_Falcon** » Sun Sep 04, 2005 10:04 pm

yeah but he was right at the half saying that Wisconsin would wear us down and run all over us the second half.

BGorDeath · Post by **BGorDeath** » Sun Sep 04, 2005 10:06 pm

Tricky_Falcon wrote:yeah but he was right at the half saying that Wisconsin would wear us down and run all over us the second half.

His still a douche bag. I believe "Meadow Fields" scent.

Tricky_Falcon · Post by **Tricky_Falcon** » Sun Sep 04, 2005 10:15 pm

Warthog · Post by **Warthog** » Mon Sep 05, 2005 12:21 am

Actually, the correct nickname for Trev as established a few weeks back is douchemonkey

Bleeding Orange · Post by **Bleeding Orange** » Mon Sep 05, 2005 12:27 am

Warthog wrote:Actually, the correct nickname for Trev as established a few weeks back is douchemonkey

Boy, if there is one thing I hope to see before I die, its a meadow fields scented douchemonkey!

Hmmm....I wonder if Tucson has a zoo...

CapitalFalcon · Post by **CapitalFalcon** » Mon Sep 05, 2005 11:32 pm

Bleeding Orange wrote:Boy, if there is one thing I hope to see before I die, its a meadow fields scented douchemonkey!

What do you mean??? Just tune into ESPN every weekend!

Jacobs4Heisman · Post by **Jacobs4Heisman** » Mon Sep 05, 2005 11:34 pm

actually I believe Trev Alberts smells of elderberries.

redskins4ever · Post by **redskins4ever** » Tue Sep 06, 2005 7:44 am

You can add Craig James to that list as well as Lee Corso....

CapitalFalcon · Post by **CapitalFalcon** » Tue Sep 06, 2005 10:58 am

In association with my other post, what has our team done to show Alberts, Corso, etc. that we are more than just another Mid-Major?

BGorDeath · Post by **BGorDeath** » Tue Sep 06, 2005 11:27 am

CapitalFalcon wrote:In association with my other post, what has our team done to show Alberts, Corso, etc. that we are more than just another Mid-Major?

My original post was in regard to Mr. Douche Bag (he is no longer Trev Alberts to me). My opinion of Mr. Douche Bag has nothing to do with his opinions of BG. I just think Mr. Douche Bag is an arrogant prick and what spews forth from his pie hole is nothing but garbage. 90% of what he says is degrading to whoever he is spewing about. I do not understand why he has a job at ESPN. I find him utterly useless, yet I can't look away from this train wreck of an announcer.

It's the Journey... · Tue Sep 06, 2005 11:30 am

Originally posted by CapitalFalcon:
In association with my other post, what has our team done to show Alberts, Corso, etc. that we are more than just another Mid-Major?

Well, we haven't done anything this year to show we are anything more than a mid-major program. We went into a Big Ten stadium and watched our defence give the game away because our cordinator can't make adjustments. Until we start playing a COMPLETE game of football we will have to deal with their impressions of us.

transfer2BGSU · Post by **transfer2BGSU** » Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:37 pm

It's the Journey... wrote:We went into a Big Ten stadium and watched our defence give the game away because our cordinator can't make adjustments.

WAIT A MINUTE!

Are you blaming the defensive COORDINATOR? Novel concept - placing the defensive responsibilities on the defensive coordinator. Not too bad there Lyons (for a Poli Sci grad).

1987alum · Post by **1987alum** » Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:41 pm

I'll say this, as an amateur student of the game ...

1) Our defense didn't seem to change much after the first half. Spielman noted that he wouldn've liked to have seen some stunts up front, which make sense given the amount of bulk we were giving up at the point of attack. Our linebacker appeared to be playing a straight read and react drop instead of swarming to the ball consistently. That clearly wasn't working, so adjustments were in order.

2) The above being said, I'm more distressed at the players who didn't make plays when they appeared to be in a position to do so.

kdog27 · Post by **kdog27** » Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:44 pm

1987alum wrote:2) The above being said, I'm more distressed at the players who didn't make plays when they appeared to be in a position to do so.

Same here, I knew they would be able to run on us but I am really upset that the tackling problems have not changed a bit. I thought this new DC would stress things like that. Calhoun will break 99/100 arm tackles. On so many plays I thought we were going to stick them for minimal gain but...