Nice article on Omar Jacobs on the Boise website!

SDbronco · Post by **SDbronco** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:28 pm

If any of you read it, it would be nice to hear what you guys think. Does this seem pretty accurate to you? I'm sure sooking forward to this game. I think both teams have a lot to prove in this one.

http://boisestate.scout.com/2/440383.html

MACMAN · Post by **MACMAN** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 1:24 am

Well lets just start with this...I dont think either team has anything to prove at this point inthe season. We Both lost our big openers, which in turn dashed any and all shots at the BCS busting. We just won by the skin of our chiny chin chin our first conference opener in several years, which is a relief. A game that we should have by most accounts had a better handle on.
You all lost your second game in a row, some thing you have not done in any recent time.
Now we are to play in a game, a game that is not of BCS busting Giants, a game that could have been dubed as KING OF MIDS, but still might be. A game that has no impact on our teams goal of wining our first MAC championship in over a Decade. You guys are trying to win to avoid losing a home opener, and more so trying to not go 0 and 3. A start that would be the worst for the Broncos in over 14 years I believe.

Teh game will good, we have a great O, a great O that is subject to stumbles, but will bring our best game to the blue turf. We have D issues, issues that I bellieve may stem from adapting to a new D coach...i hope the issues are worked out and that you get their best game.

Overall both teams have kicking issues...nothing is automatic for either of us in that dept...so the O will have to carry the day.
LEts play some football and see what we see... my guess is total points 96.

Metz · Post by **Metz** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 1:36 am

The only thing not accurate is the part where it says he's a junior. He's a (RS) senior.

Schadenfreude · Post by **Schadenfreude** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 7:26 am

Metz wrote:The only thing not accurate is the part where it says he's a junior. He's a (RS) senior.

Uh, he's a redshirt junior, Metz.

Metz · Post by **Metz** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:11 am

Schadenfreude wrote:
Metz wrote:The only thing not accurate is the part where it says he's a junior. He's a (RS) senior.
Uh, he's a redshirt junior, Metz.

1:30 am, tired, thinking he has junior status (RS) but it's technically his senior year (Senior)...now you see where it came from.

Schadenfreude · Post by **Schadenfreude** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:40 am

Metz wrote:
Schadenfreude wrote:
Metz wrote:The only thing not accurate is the part where it says he's a junior. He's a (RS) senior.
Uh, he's a redshirt junior, Metz.
1:30 am, tired, thinking he has junior status (RS) but it's technically his senior year (Senior)...now you see where it came from.

Yeah, no big deal. I understood.