NOT THIS LADY!!!PGY Tiercel wrote:Of course some are for the Ladies.CapitalFalcon wrote: They are for the kids.![]()
::puke:: ::puke:: ::puke::
::puke:: ::puke:: ::puke::
Wow, that was low, REALLY low!!!

NOT THIS LADY!!!PGY Tiercel wrote:Of course some are for the Ladies.CapitalFalcon wrote: They are for the kids.![]()

I think this belongs in another thread.FreddieandFrieda wrote:
P.S. FRANK SOLICH DOESN'T THINK THERE IS ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE TOLEDO MASCOT!

Thanks for chiming in. Realize these aren't personal attacks, just opinions. Tell Mr. Ginnsburg I said hi, and next time make sure the caps lock is offWE READ THIS TOO!
AS MUCH AS WE LIKE OUR (GREAT) GRANDPARENTS, THEIR SUITS WERE FALLING APART! YOU WILL BE HAPPY TO KNOW THAT THEY HAVE BEEN PUT IN THE UNIVERSITY ARCHIVES AND ARE ON DISPLAY FOR THOSE WHO ARE LOOKING FOR THE OLDER ONES!
THE BIRDS ARE HERE TO REPRESENT BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY TO THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY, NOT TO BEAT PEOPLE UP! WE CAN CERTAINLY ROUGH UP OTHER MASCOTS BUT WE DONT WANT TO SCARE AWAY THE KIDS! TRUST US, WE DO THAT ALREADY!!!! WHILE WE DO LOVE GOING TO GAMES, A LARGE PORTION OF OUR TIME IS DEVOTED TO APPEARENCES AROUND THE CAMPUS AND THE CITY IN ORDER TO MAKE PEOPLE SMILE AND HAVE FUN!!!
THANKS FOR ALL YOUR SUPPORT AND WE CANT WAIT TO SEE YOU AT THE DOYT!!!!!!!!!!
P.S. FRANK SOLICH DOESN'T THINK THERE IS ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE TOLEDO MASCOT!



Minor point, but technically to be Falcons they should have feathers on their wings and shouldn't have furry hands.Godsgirlerific wrote:Hey, give them a break. Have you ever tried to type with big furry hands?It's the Journey... wrote:Tell Mr. Ginnsburg I said hi, and next time make sure the caps lock is off

I'm not sure any of us could bear a dime.UK Peregrine wrote:Minor point, but technically to be Falcons they should have feathers on their wings and shouldn't have furry hands.Perhaps that's the reason certain people like the old mascots better, becasue they incorporated what resembled feathers. I mean really, the class Mammalia consists of an extremely diverse group in the animal kingdom with certain distinguishing features. Mammals are endothermic and have a high rate of metabolism, just like the class Aves. In fact, if your into Linnean classification, then both mammals and birds are in the same Domain (Eukarya), Kingdom (Animalia), Phylum (Chordata), and Subphylum (Vertebrata). However, mammals and birds diverge at the Class level due to unique features to mammals and birds. Mammals for example, have hair and mammary glands. Birds on the other hand have feathers. Now, it true that both are structurally similar in that the are both comprised of keratin (quills of feathers), but I think you'd be hard pressed to find a scientist that would consider them the same. I mean really, human hair is approximately 14% cystine (cysteins cross-linked by disulfide bridges) while feathers are only 10%.
Just my two cents.

Huh?UK Peregrine wrote:Minor point, but technically to be Falcons they should have feathers on their wings and shouldn't have furry hands.Godsgirlerific wrote:Hey, give them a break. Have you ever tried to type with big furry hands?It's the Journey... wrote:Tell Mr. Ginnsburg I said hi, and next time make sure the caps lock is offPerhaps that's the reason certain people like the old mascots better, becasue they incorporated what resembled feathers. I mean really, the class Mammalia consists of an extremely diverse group in the animal kingdom with certain distinguishing features. Mammals are endothermic and have a high rate of metabolism, just like the class Aves. In fact, if your into Linnean classification, then both mammals and birds are in the same Domain (Eukarya), Kingdom (Animalia), Phylum (Chordata), and Subphylum (Vertebrata). However, mammals and birds diverge at the Class level due to unique features to mammals and birds. Mammals for example, have hair and mammary glands. Birds on the other hand have feathers. Now, it true that both are structurally similar in that the are both comprised of keratin (quills of feathers), but I think you'd be hard pressed to find a scientist that would consider them the same. I mean really, human hair is approximately 14% cystine (cysteins cross-linked by disulfide bridges) while feathers are only 10%.
Just my two cents.

I think the Freaklings will always be available to help "rough up" the other mascots.FreddieandFrieda wrote:WE READ THIS TOO!
AS MUCH AS WE LIKE OUR (GREAT) GRANDPARENTS, THEIR SUITS WERE FALLING APART! YOU WILL BE HAPPY TO KNOW THAT THEY HAVE BEEN PUT IN THE UNIVERSITY ARCHIVES AND ARE ON DISPLAY FOR THOSE WHO ARE LOOKING FOR THE OLDER ONES!
THE BIRDS ARE HERE TO REPRESENT BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY TO THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY, NOT TO BEAT PEOPLE UP! WE CAN CERTAINLY ROUGH UP OTHER MASCOTS BUT WE DONT WANT TO SCARE AWAY THE KIDS! TRUST US, WE DO THAT ALREADY!!!! WHILE WE DO LOVE GOING TO GAMES, A LARGE PORTION OF OUR TIME IS DEVOTED TO APPEARENCES AROUND THE CAMPUS AND THE CITY IN ORDER TO MAKE PEOPLE SMILE AND HAVE FUN!!!
THANKS FOR ALL YOUR SUPPORT AND WE CANT WAIT TO SEE YOU AT THE DOYT!!!!!!!!!!
P.S. FRANK SOLICH DOESN'T THINK THERE IS ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE TOLEDO MASCOT!


TWO CENTS?!?!?! That was more like a Sacajawea Dollar!UK Peregrine wrote:Minor point, but technically to be Falcons they should have feathers on their wings and shouldn't have furry hands.Perhaps that's the reason certain people like the old mascots better, becasue they incorporated what resembled feathers. I mean really, the class Mammalia consists of an extremely diverse group in the animal kingdom with certain distinguishing features. Mammals are endothermic and have a high rate of metabolism, just like the class Aves. In fact, if your into Linnean classification, then both mammals and birds are in the same Domain (Eukarya), Kingdom (Animalia), Phylum (Chordata), and Subphylum (Vertebrata). However, mammals and birds diverge at the Class level due to unique features to mammals and birds. Mammals for example, have hair and mammary glands. Birds on the other hand have feathers. Now, it true that both are structurally similar in that the are both comprised of keratin (quills of feathers), but I think you'd be hard pressed to find a scientist that would consider them the same. I mean really, human hair is approximately 14% cystine (cysteins cross-linked by disulfide bridges) while feathers are only 10%.
Just my two cents.
I'm predicting triple coverage for the Bobcat mascot Saturday!Falconfreak90 wrote:I think the Freaklings will always be available to help "rough up" the other mascots.
That Ball State Cardinal got the business.

UK Peregrine wrote:Minor point, but technically to be Falcons they should have feathers on their wings and shouldn't have furry hands.Godsgirlerific wrote:Hey, give them a break. Have you ever tried to type with big furry hands?It's the Journey... wrote:Tell Mr. Ginnsburg I said hi, and next time make sure the caps lock is offPerhaps that's the reason certain people like the old mascots better, becasue they incorporated what resembled feathers. I mean really, the class Mammalia consists of an extremely diverse group in the animal kingdom with certain distinguishing features. Mammals are endothermic and have a high rate of metabolism, just like the class Aves. In fact, if your into Linnean classification, then both mammals and birds are in the same Domain (Eukarya), Kingdom (Animalia), Phylum (Chordata), and Subphylum (Vertebrata). However, mammals and birds diverge at the Class level due to unique features to mammals and birds. Mammals for example, have hair and mammary glands. Birds on the other hand have feathers. Now, it true that both are structurally similar in that the are both comprised of keratin (quills of feathers), but I think you'd be hard pressed to find a scientist that would consider them the same. I mean really, human hair is approximately 14% cystine (cysteins cross-linked by disulfide bridges) while feathers are only 10%.
Just my two cents.