BG vs Ohio Grades...

Discussion of the Falcon football team.
Post Reply
Falconboy
John Lovett's Successor
John Lovett's Successor
Posts: 5357
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Columbus
Contact:

BG vs Ohio Grades...

Post by Falconboy »

BG Offense- B
BG Defense-B+
BG Special Teams-Uh.....what special teams? :shock:

Wow is our special teams bad. Decent game by the offense , Solich's Bobcats are alot better defensivly than Temple thats for sure. The D stuffing OU's rushing attack to 68 is huge, we haven't held anyone under 100 yds rushing since maybe the Pleiostene Age. Now I don't know how much of that was us being real dominant or the Bobcats losing possibly up to 3 starting offensive lineman during the game. It sure seemed after that 2nd OU O-linman went down we got even more pressure on OU's qb and containing the run. But that aside the effort was very much impressive as was the tackling alot better. Ohio rushed for 360 vs Kent , us to hold them to 68 is definitly good. Some of us posters should go over to the Coach Brandon and offer to coach special teams and we probably couldn't be much worse than what we've been, mainly punt formation blocking and returns, UGH! Oh yeah , why the heck was Turner in on kickoffs?? Is Coach B asking for an injury to our #2 qb?? Kickoffs in general are great places for guys to get injured ala P.J. this year or think Browns TE Kellen Winslow. We better not see PJ at all vs Buffalo. It better be a ton of BJ Lane and Bobby Thomas. Thomas is gonna be a stud , I can feel it. BTW , did it seem like our rushing attack got better with John Lanning came into the game? Culp went out, with what I don't know. I remember hearing Coach Brandon that Lanning at center was going to be a beast, maybe its materializing. :-\
Mid-2000's Anderson Animal
User avatar
BGDrew
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 6355
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 2:11 pm
Contact:

Post by BGDrew »

Paragraphs, paragraphs, paragraphs...

I hate our punt formation, and one of these days it will lose us a game if we don't go to a more traditional formation.
Check out our new BGSU hockey site: http://www.bgsuhockey.com
User avatar
Falconfreak90
Rubber City Falcon
Rubber City Falcon
Posts: 18541
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:28 am
Location: Green, OH
Contact:

Post by Falconfreak90 »

Our D was very solid last night...68 yards rushing and 239 total. The D keeps getting better each week.

Offense rolls up 573 yards...

Special Teams are special...but not in the good way. They really need to improve.

Solid win and now BG is in the driver's seat for the MAC East title!!

Time to shuffle off to Buffalo....C ya there.

GO FALCONS!! TRASH THE BULLS!!
Michael W.
BGSU-12 TIME MAC CHAMPION
FALCON FOOTBALL ROCKS!
User avatar
BGSU33
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 10208
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Boulder, CO

Post by BGSU33 »

Defense - Very Good.
Offense - Good.
(Un)special Teams - Who the heck coaches in this area!?!?!?
GO BG!!!
bgsufan1970
Egg
Egg
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:40 pm
Location: Eden Prairie, MN

Post by bgsufan1970 »

Defense: Showing improvement, even better if even more improvement shown in subsequent games.
Offense: Needs to get better at crunch time if we're going to win the championship.
Special Teams: I don't know much about football but I would say our punting scheme just doesn't work, our field goal kicking is really lousy, and our coverage on kickoffs leaves a lot to be desired.
bgsufan1970
cowboyjoe
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 767
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:18 am

Post by cowboyjoe »

If our offense yesterday doesn't grade out to an A than what does? 31 first downs and 573 total yards along with 5-6 red zone scores and possesed the ball for 33:14 to Ohio U's 26:46. Ask Pittsburgh what they would grade that kind of performance against OU since they had only 13 first downs and 268 total yards along with getting shut out except for a kickoff returned for TD.
User avatar
Bleeding Orange
The Abominable Desert 'Cat
The Abominable Desert 'Cat
Posts: 7065
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 8:06 pm
Location: Searching for a home, via Chicago...
Contact:

Post by Bleeding Orange »

cowboyjoe wrote:If our offense yesterday doesn't grade out to an A than what does? 31 first downs and 573 total yards along with 5-6 red zone scores and possesed the ball for 33:14 to Ohio U's 26:46. Ask Pittsburgh what they would grade that kind of performance against OU since they had only 13 first downs and 268 total yards along with getting shut out except for a kickoff returned for TD.
I think a lot of this is due to the fact that people are understandably used to an offensive ejaculation week in and week out. And, while our total yards and first downs in the end were impressive, the passing game wasn't nearly as accurate as it could have been (what was Omar, 24-41?) and we punted a lot more than normal. As scary as it is to say, we should have had much better offensive numbers - and thats no lie. :shock:
From the halls of ivy...

It is not my intention to do away with government. It is rather to make it work - work with us, not over us; stand by our side, not ride on our back. Government can and must provide opportunity, not smother it; foster productivity, not stifle it. ~Ronald Reagan

Image

:smt117
User avatar
hammb
The Stabber of Cherries
The Stabber of Cherries
Posts: 14434
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:21 am
Location: Bowling Green

Post by hammb »

Bleeding Orange wrote:
cowboyjoe wrote:If our offense yesterday doesn't grade out to an A than what does? 31 first downs and 573 total yards along with 5-6 red zone scores and possesed the ball for 33:14 to Ohio U's 26:46. Ask Pittsburgh what they would grade that kind of performance against OU since they had only 13 first downs and 268 total yards along with getting shut out except for a kickoff returned for TD.
I think a lot of this is due to the fact that people are understandably used to an offensive ejaculation week in and week out. And, while our total yards and first downs in the end were impressive, the passing game wasn't nearly as accurate as it could have been (what was Omar, 24-41?) and we punted a lot more than normal. As scary as it is to say, we should have had much better offensive numbers - and thats no lie. :shock:
Seemed to me we racked up a lot of yards & first downs, but struggled to put long enough drives together to score. This is, of course, hampered by our inability to kick a FG. Suisham would've likely made the missed one, and would've also lined up for a 50 yarder downwind, where we went for it, and failed, on 4th down.

I wouldn't give our offense an A, because we know they can do better. They played well enough to win with the defensive effort we got, and I'd much rather have strong defense and only good offense than great offense with lousy defense.

As you stated, Omar's accuracy was a little off (tough BG wind), and there were some dropped balls as well. I don't worry about the offense much, but they can play better than they did. They set their bar VERY high :)
User avatar
Schadenfreude
Professional tractor puller
Professional tractor puller
Posts: 6983
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
Location: Colorado

Post by Schadenfreude »

Omar missed some deep throws. He had what would have been an outstanding game for most quarterbacks. But he's capable of better.
cowboyjoe
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 767
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:18 am

Post by cowboyjoe »

Could have been much better?....wonder how many Division 1 teams scored over 30 points on Saturday.
User avatar
Bleeding Orange
The Abominable Desert 'Cat
The Abominable Desert 'Cat
Posts: 7065
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 8:06 pm
Location: Searching for a home, via Chicago...
Contact:

Post by Bleeding Orange »

cowboyjoe wrote:Could have been much better?....wonder how many Division 1 teams scored over 30 points on Saturday.
It's all relative, pardner.
From the halls of ivy...

It is not my intention to do away with government. It is rather to make it work - work with us, not over us; stand by our side, not ride on our back. Government can and must provide opportunity, not smother it; foster productivity, not stifle it. ~Ronald Reagan

Image

:smt117
Post Reply