1987alum wrote:*sigh *TJRocket wrote:Grass is fine if thats what you want to play on, but there is no need to rip another school for using the artificial stuff because your school can't afford to install it. Just makes you look envious.
It always comes back to envy for you TJ, doesn't it? Perhaps BG's Powers That Be like grass.
Congrats!
Re: UT vs Ball State
Re: UT vs Ball State
I'm positive it is NOT a financial issue. The fake crap pays for itself in about a season or two. It is because football was meant to be played on grass, and should only be played on grass.TJRocket wrote:Grass is fine if thats what you want to play on, but there is no need to rip another school for using the artificial stuff because your school can't afford to install it. Just makes you look envious.
Personally, I wish the NCAA would outlaw all artificial surfaces, but they won't do that.
Re: UT vs Ball State
Im sorry if I hurt your feelings. I suppose though that in some cases it may not be envy that Bg fans have towards Toledo, im sure that there are some that are just bitter towards Toledo. Those that are bitter have every right to be bitter I suppose, after all Toledo is better than BG in every way.1987alum wrote:*sigh *TJRocket wrote:Grass is fine if thats what you want to play on, but there is no need to rip another school for using the artificial stuff because your school can't afford to install it. Just makes you look envious.
It always comes back to envy for you TJ, doesn't it? Perhaps BG's Powers That Be like grass.
2005 GMAC Bowl champs!
Re: UT vs Ball State
Proof, once again, that crack don't smoke itself.TJRocket wrote:Those that are bitter have every right to be bitter I suppose, after all Toledo is better than BG in every way.
-
Tricky_Falcon
- Peregrine

- Posts: 2984
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:23 pm
- Location: The State of Bowling Green
- Schadenfreude
- Professional tractor puller

- Posts: 6983
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
- Location: Colorado
Re: UT vs Ball State
I didn't start this. One of your dildo friends did.TJRocket wrote: Grass is fine if thats what you want to play on, but there is no need to rip another school for using the artificial stuff because your school can't afford to install it. Just makes you look envious.
Look, if God had intended for football to be played on plastic, He would have also have created plastic trees from which our forefathers could have woven fields on which to play.
Re: UT vs Ball State
Now you are just being dumb.TJRocket wrote:after all Toledo is better than BG in every way.
-
rocketfootball
- Peregrine

- Posts: 758
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 3:04 pm
Re: UT vs Ball State
That's real mature schade, calling me a dildo. I usually have respect for you and your posts, but.....Schadenfreude wrote:I didn't start this. One of your dildo friends did.TJRocket wrote: Grass is fine if thats what you want to play on, but there is no need to rip another school for using the artificial stuff because your school can't afford to install it. Just makes you look envious.
Look, if God had intended for football to be played on plastic, He would have also have created plastic trees from which our forefathers could have woven fields on which to play.
Re: UT vs Ball State
good pointSchadenfreude wrote:I didn't start this. One of your dildo friends did.TJRocket wrote: Grass is fine if thats what you want to play on, but there is no need to rip another school for using the artificial stuff because your school can't afford to install it. Just makes you look envious.
Look, if God had intended for football to be played on plastic, He would have also have created plastic trees from which our forefathers could have woven fields on which to play.
2005 GMAC Bowl champs!
- Schadenfreude
- Professional tractor puller

- Posts: 6983
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
- Location: Colorado
Re: UT vs Ball State
It's not personal. Seriously. All Toledo fans are dildos.rocketfootball wrote: That's real mature schade, calling me a dildo. I usually have respect for you and your posts, but.....
That is your mascot, isn't it?
Re: UT vs Ball State
Attack the message, not the messenger. Is that not the "motto" around here?kdog27 wrote:Now you are just being dumb.TJRocket wrote:after all Toledo is better than BG in every way.
2005 GMAC Bowl champs!
Re: UT vs Ball State
Go cry somewhere else. Next time I will include an emoticonTJRocket wrote:Attack the message, not the messenger. Is that not the "motto" around here?kdog27 wrote:Now you are just being dumb.TJRocket wrote:after all Toledo is better than BG in every way.
Re: UT vs Ball State
The mascot is a Rocket. Are you telling me that everytime you see a Rocket you think of a dildo? I think that speaks volumes about your state of mind, don't you?Schadenfreude wrote:It's not personal. Seriously. All Toledo fans are dildos.rocketfootball wrote: That's real mature schade, calling me a dildo. I usually have respect for you and your posts, but.....
That is your mascot, isn't it?
2005 GMAC Bowl champs!
Re: UT vs Ball State
I think TJ has a point here.TJRocket wrote:Attack the message, not the messenger. Is that not the "motto" around here?kdog27 wrote:Now you are just being dumb.TJRocket wrote:after all Toledo is better than BG in every way.
A more appropriate post might have been ...
"Now you are just making stupid posts."

