Bleeding Orange wrote:Schade, you know what? Read my damned post before you start ripping me a new one.
I read it again. I stand by my previous post.
I was not making any sort of insinuation that anyone on the BG News should be reprimanded.
I disagree. Quoting:
Misrepresenting stats, standings, names, etc. is the journalistic equivalent of plagiarism in academia. There is never an excuse for plagiarism, and the penalties are severe for committing infractions of that nature. Saying that students should not be held to account for their printed mistakes for any reason is just plain sad, and shows a lack of integrity, in my opinion.
And yes, misprinting quotes is exactly like plagiarism.
Let me remind you of your original proposition:
Misrepresenting stats, standings, names, etc. is the journalistic equivalent of plagiarism in academia.
You used the word "misrepresent."
Merriam-Webster defines "misrepresentation" as.
to give a false or misleading representation of usually with an intent to deceive or be unfair
So, as I stated previously, your use of the word "misrepresent" implies intent -- and invents a scenario that did not actually occur.
The poor kid typed "1-1" instead of "2-0." You think he meant to do that?
Do you seriously think any journalist misspells a name or screws up a stat intentionally?
It doesn't happen. These are, quite simply, mistakes.
Let's discuss plagiarism.
Go to any registrar's office at any university in the world, and you will see that intent is not a factor in plagiarism. Whether one intends to plagiarize or not, they are still guilty of it and there are no concessions made in any policy for doing it accidentally (although a nice professor or dean may make accomodations.
Forget intent. Let's talk about what it means to plagiarize:
Merriam-Webster:
transitive senses : to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own : use (another's production) without crediting the source
intransitive senses : to commit literary theft : present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source
The leap from erroneously reporting Bowling Green's record to passing off someone else's work off as your own is enormous.
The comparison is absurd.
Again, just stating an opinion rooted in academic fact - so don't come after me when you are wrong.
I disagree. I stand by my previous post.